• Blog Home
  • Football Schedule
  • Basketball Schedule
  • 2012 Recruiting Class
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
How Long Must Expansion Talk Go On? 04/20/2010
4 Comments
 
Picture
Jim Delany wants to destroy the SEC! (Photo via ESPN.com)
Drew Thurman (9:44 am)

This weekend we found out that the Big Ten was accelerating the timetable to expand the conference after previously announcing they would take 12 to 18 months. Prior to this latest discovery, the thought of adding another one to five teams seemed like nothing more than a dream, but now it appears that it is a quickly becoming a reality.

If your like me, your already sick of all this expansion talk. It's getting old reading writers and bloggers list potential candidates, and even more annoying is the constant drama going on with Notre Dame. If it wasn't enough that they appear every Saturday on NBC or that the media spends more time talking about their losses than most team's wins, this expansion talk has now put them even more in the spotlight. So, excuse me if I want this expansion stuff to pass quickly.

Unfortunately, it has most likely just begun. Jim Delany and the Big Ten may be opening a can of worms, that could have expansion be a central issue in college football for years to come. As Matt Hinton of Dr. Saturday says, the Big Ten might be starting a conference war.

"Under that timeline, the Big Ten -- and the Pac-10, too, which wants to have its new configuration in place when it goes into negotiations for its new television contracts this summer -- could send the first domino in the great Conference Realignment Wars of 2010 tumbling before the start of the season, a potentially torturous process depending on how many teams the Big Ten decides to poach. By the end of the year, the chaotic march toward the long-envisioned age of the superconference, already responsible for the death of the old Southwest Conference and dozens of other eruptions that have shaped the landscape over the last 40 years, is likely to resume in full force as the SEC mulls its counterattack and the "affected conferences" scramble for their lives." 
So, the Big Ten's decision to maybe add such super powers as Syracuse, Rutgers, and Missouri may just incite the entire college football landscape to keep pace.

What does that mean?

Well, the expansion talk may have just begun rather the coming to the end. Let's face it, college football is no longer a sport centered around the beauty of a Saturday afternoons, it's become a business. Conference superiority is starting to outweigh the joy of long standing rivalries, and television revenues are speaking louder than what may be best for the sport. I like what Dennis Dodd of CBSSports.com had to say:

"Regional conferences have morphed into national networks and we may never look back. But heed these words of caution before we take off into a true age of Airplane Conferences.

'You [still] need to have the ability to drive to each other's campus, one former major-college athletic director said, 'and really hate each other.'"

I may not be popular for saying this, but I am ready for expansion talk to be done. Don't get me wrong, I hate the SEC chants as much as the next guy, but I'm not ready to watch the headlines of the most superior sport on the planet be dominated by expansion talks. I really don't want to have conference commissioners and college presidents ruining things out of greed, much like the talks of adding teams to NCAA Tournament. Why make the best spectacle in sports a money hungry ego contest?

Maybe I'm being overdramatic, and maybe adding a few teams to the Big Ten won't bring about such drastic changes. But we have ask ourselves, are we ready for what could possibly take place? Will we be content with the ramifications of this conference shakeup?
 


Comments

Brent
04/20/2010 17:21

The Big Ten wants the money, and they will probably head the east coast for Rutgers, Syracuse, and UConn. This may force a few people to watch the BTN, but I doubt it makes the waves people think.

Reply
buckeyenut
04/20/2010 17:32

Brian Cook of "The Sporting Blog" agrees with you:

"As with a lot of things that promise to make money hand over fist, the only people who benefit are the ones pulling the strings."

LINK: http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/the_sporting_blog/entry/view/63260/big_ten_expansion_bigger_isnt_better

Reply
Stan
04/20/2010 19:39

Agreed....Big 10 expansion talk is getting old. I am sick of the hypotheticals and proposals.

Reply
busta
04/21/2010 17:30

Armageddon!!!!

Reply



Leave a Reply

    Picture
    Picture

    Subscribe

    RSS Feed

    Buckeye Links

    Along the Olentangy
    Brutus Report
    Buckeye Banter
    Buckeye House Call
    Buckeye Planet
    Bucknuts
    Bucks Insider
    Eleven Warriors
    Men of the Scarlet & Gray
    Our Honor Defend
    Scarlet Buckeye
    The Buckeye Battle Cry
    The Buckeye Blog

    Categories

    All
    Basketball
    Big Ten
    Daves Imo
    Football
    Football News
    Live Blog
    Michigan
    Opinion
    Other Sports
    Preview
    Recruiting
    Video
    Website News

    Archives

    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008

    Change.org|Start an Online Petition »
    Picture

Copyright © 2008-12, The Silver Bullet. All rights reserved. TSB is not affiliated with The Ohio State University.